linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f97510c-eb6c-4f3b-b219-aa8d895b060b@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 08:00:32 +0530
From: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby
	<jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <psodagud@...cinc.com>, <djaggi@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, <quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_arandive@...cinc.com>, <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>, Nikunj Kela
	<quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p

Hi Krzysztof

On 5/4/2025 10:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 10:44:10PM GMT, Praveen Talari wrote:
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - interrupts
>> +  - power-domains
>> +  - power-domain-names
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
>> +    serial@...000 {
>> +        compatible = "qcom,sa8255p-geni-uart";
>> +        reg = <0x990000 0x4000>;
>> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 531 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> Why isn't here wakeup interrupt? Commit msg also does not help me to
> understand why number of interrupts varies.

Currently we are not using wake-irq because it is optional for our 
current implementation.

this irq configuration is same as sa87750.dtsi.


Thanks,

Praveen talari

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>