linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 464/486] wifi: rtw89: add wiphy_lock() to work that isn't held wiphy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250505223922.2682012-464-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon,  5 May 2025 18:39:00 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 464/486] wifi: rtw89: add wiphy_lock() to work that isn't held wiphy_lock() yet

From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>

[ Upstream commit ebfc9199df05d37b67f4d1b7ee997193f3d2e7c8 ]

To ensure where are protected by driver mutex can also be protected by
wiphy_lock(), so afterward we can remove driver mutex safely.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122060310.31976-2-pkshih@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/regd.c | 2 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c  | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/regd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/regd.c
index bb064a086970b..e8df68818da01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/regd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/regd.c
@@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ void rtw89_regd_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct regulatory_request *request
 	struct ieee80211_hw *hw = wiphy_to_ieee80211_hw(wiphy);
 	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
 
+	wiphy_lock(wiphy);
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 	rtw89_leave_ps_mode(rtwdev);
 
@@ -712,6 +713,7 @@ void rtw89_regd_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct regulatory_request *request
 
 exit:
 	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+	wiphy_unlock(wiphy);
 }
 
 /* Maximum Transmit Power field (@raw) can be EIRP or PSD.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
index 7b203bb7f151a..02c2ac12f197a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
@@ -156,9 +156,11 @@ static void ser_state_run(struct rtw89_ser *ser, u8 evt)
 	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_SER, "ser: %s receive %s\n",
 		    ser_st_name(ser), ser_ev_name(ser, evt));
 
+	wiphy_lock(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 	rtw89_leave_lps(rtwdev);
 	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+	wiphy_unlock(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
 
 	ser->st_tbl[ser->state].st_func(ser, evt);
 }
@@ -707,9 +709,11 @@ static void ser_l2_reset_st_hdl(struct rtw89_ser *ser, u8 evt)
 
 	switch (evt) {
 	case SER_EV_STATE_IN:
+		wiphy_lock(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
 		mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 		ser_l2_reset_st_pre_hdl(ser);
 		mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+		wiphy_unlock(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
 
 		ieee80211_restart_hw(rtwdev->hw);
 		ser_set_alarm(ser, SER_RECFG_TIMEOUT, SER_EV_L2_RECFG_TIMEOUT);
-- 
2.39.5