linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 557/642] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250505221419.2672473-557-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon,  5 May 2025 18:12:53 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
	joel@...lfernandes.org,
	josh@...htriplett.org,
	urezki@...il.com,
	rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 557/642] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y

From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 83b28cfe796464ebbde1cf7916c126da6d572685 ]

With PREEMPT_RCU=n, cond_resched() provides urgently needed quiescent
states for read-side critical sections via rcu_all_qs().
One reason why this was needed: lacking preempt-count, the tick
handler has no way of knowing whether it is executing in a
read-side critical section or not.

With (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n), we get (PREEMPT_COUNT=y,
PREEMPT_RCU=n). In this configuration cond_resched() is a stub and
does not provide quiescent states via rcu_all_qs().
(PREEMPT_RCU=y provides this information via rcu_read_unlock() and
its nesting counter.)

So, use the availability of preempt_count() to report quiescent states
in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq().

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 3600152b858e8..4328ff3252a35 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -975,13 +975,16 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 static void rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(int user)
 {
-	if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
+	if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() ||
+	     (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) &&
+	      (preempt_count() == HARDIRQ_OFFSET))) {
 
 		/*
 		 * Get here if this CPU took its interrupt from user
-		 * mode or from the idle loop, and if this is not a
-		 * nested interrupt.  In this case, the CPU is in
-		 * a quiescent state, so note it.
+		 * mode, from the idle loop without this being a nested
+		 * interrupt, or while not holding the task preempt count
+		 * (with PREEMPT_COUNT=y). In this case, the CPU is in a
+		 * quiescent state, so note it.
 		 *
 		 * No memory barrier is required here because rcu_qs()
 		 * references only CPU-local variables that other CPUs
-- 
2.39.5