linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests: ublk: more misc fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a6050b3-03f6-4c22-a2c3-33ab6a453376@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 16:44:19 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests: ublk: more misc fixes

On 5/5/25 2:34 PM, Uday Shankar wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:31:40PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Can you take a look at Ming's comment on the first patch and merge the
>> set if things look good? I can rebase/repost it as needed.
> 
> Bleh, sorry, I meant to send this as a reply to v2:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250429-ublk_selftests-v2-0-e970b6d9e4f4@purestorage.com/

Let's give Ming a chance to review v2, then I can get it queued up.

-- 
Jens Axboe