lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBlgH4CAsO9oYXAo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 18:04:31 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Max Grobecker <max@...becker.info>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, 
	x86@...nel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, perry.yuan@....com, 
	mario.limonciello@....com, riel@...riel.com, mjguzik@...il.com, 
	darwi@...utronix.de, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_X86_HYPERVISOR (was: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 2/6] x86/cpu:
 Don't clear X86_FEATURE_LAHF_LM flag in init_amd_k8() on AMD when running in
 a virtual machine)

On Sat, Apr 26, 2025, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On April 26, 2025 3:08:29 AM GMT+03:00, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >No, that would defeat the purpose of the check.  The X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR has
> >nothing to do with correctness, it's all about performance.  Critically, it's a
> >static check that gets patched at runtime.  It's a micro-optimization for bare
> >metal to avoid a single cache miss (the __this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7)).  Routing
> >through cc_platform_has() would be far, far heavier than calling hw_breakpoint_active().
> 
> Huh, we care so much about speed here?

That's a PeterZ question :-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ