[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBnDI_40fX7SM4tp@wunner.de>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:06:59 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 382/642] PCI/pwrctrl: Move
pci_pwrctrl_unregister() to pci_destroy_dev()
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 06:09:58PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 2d923930f2e3fe1ecf060169f57980da819a191f ]
>
> The PCI core will try to access the devices even after pci_stop_dev()
> for things like Data Object Exchange (DOE), ASPM, etc.
>
> So, move pci_pwrctrl_unregister() to the near end of pci_destroy_dev()
> to make sure that the devices are powered down only after the PCI core
> is done with them.
The above was patch [2/5] in this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250116-pci-pwrctrl-slot-v3-0-827473c8fbf4@linaro.org/
... so I think the preceding patch [1/5] is a prerequisite and would
need to be cherry-picked as well. Upstream commit id is:
957f40d039a98d630146f74f94b3f60a40a449e4
That said, I'm not sure this is really a fix that merits backporting
to stable. Mani may have more comments whether it makes sense.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists