[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBnmy_Bmf-H0wxqz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:39:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x2)
* Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2025, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Could we please emit a one-time syslog warning & diagnostic when we run
> > across invalid or otherwise weird looking CPUID data, instead of just
> > silently skipping and sanitizing it?
> >
>
> Sure; will do.
Thanks! We haven't been doing this for any of the current code, right?
So depending on how frequent these messages are in practice, we might
have to tone it down a bit - but shining a bit of light on that dark
corner would be informative I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists