lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBnmy_Bmf-H0wxqz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:39:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x2)


* Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 06 May 2025, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Could we please emit a one-time syslog warning & diagnostic when we run
> > across invalid or otherwise weird looking CPUID data, instead of just
> > silently skipping and sanitizing it?
> >
> 
> Sure; will do.

Thanks! We haven't been doing this for any of the current code, right? 
So depending on how frequent these messages are in practice, we might 
have to tone it down a bit - but shining a bit of light on that dark 
corner would be informative I think.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ