linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: dma: nvidia,tegra20-apbdma: convert text based binding to json schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03aedee5-bab9-4f36-8d71-f31496832629@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 13:11:12 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Charan Pedumuru <charan.pedumuru@...il.com>, Vinod Koul
 <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
 Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: dma: nvidia,tegra20-apbdma: convert
 text based binding to json schema

On 06/05/2025 12:46, Charan Pedumuru wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06-05-2025 13:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/05/2025 09:07, Charan Pedumuru wrote:
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>
>> Why is this a irq.h now?
>>
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/tegra186-reset.h>
>>> +    dma-controller@...0a000 {
>>> +        compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-apbdma", "nvidia,tegra20-apbdma";
>>> +        reg = <0x6000a000 0x1200>;
>>> +        interrupts = <0 136 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 137 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 138 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 139 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 140 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 141 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 142 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 143 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 144 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 145 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 146 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 147 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 148 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 149 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 150 0x04>,
>>> +                     <0 151 0x04>;
>>
>>
>> Again, quoting:
>>
>> You included this...
>> ... so use it.
>>
>> Otherwise what would be the point of including the header?
> 
> 
> Yes, I understood it now, will remove the header.

No, I asked to use the header.

Best regards,
Krzysztof