[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qhblitwmuhnb7axrflsqh7pmshmhrehh2hina23k6zqq7mhafv@xtsl376cyooy>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:53:22 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
bvanassche@....org, andersson@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com,
quic_cang@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 06/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off
On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 09:22:06PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/2025 9:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:54:35PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> > > Rename qmp_ufs_disable to qmp_ufs_power_off to better represent its
> > > functionality. Additionally, move the qmp_ufs_exit() call inside
> > > qmp_ufs_power_off to preserve the functionality of .power_off.
> > >
> > > There is no functional change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 30 +++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> > > index 94095393148c..c501223fc5f9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> > > @@ -1835,6 +1835,15 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy)
> > > +{
> > > + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > +
> > > + qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp);
> >
> > Just inline it, unless you have any other plans.
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I have inlined qcom_ufs_com_exit in patch #7 of the same series. I separated
> it into a different patch to keep each patch simpler.
You have inlined qmp_ufs_com_exit() contents. Here I've asked you to
inline qmp_ufs_exit(), keeping qmp_ufs_com_exit() as is.
>
> Could you please review patch #7 and share your thoughts.
>
> [PATCH V4 07/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline
> qmp_ufs_com_exit().
>
>
> Regards,
> Nitin
>
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > > {
> > > struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > @@ -1851,28 +1860,11 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > > qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL],
> > > SW_PWRDN);
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy)
> > > -{
> > > - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > -
> > > - qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp);
> > > + qmp_ufs_exit(phy);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int qmp_ufs_disable(struct phy *phy)
> > > -{
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - ret = qmp_ufs_power_off(phy);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > > - return qmp_ufs_exit(phy);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode)
> > > {
> > > struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > @@ -1921,7 +1913,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > > static const struct phy_ops qcom_qmp_ufs_phy_ops = {
> > > .init = qmp_ufs_phy_init,
> > > .power_on = qmp_ufs_power_on,
> > > - .power_off = qmp_ufs_disable,
> > > + .power_off = qmp_ufs_power_off,
> > > .calibrate = qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate,
> > > .set_mode = qmp_ufs_set_mode,
> > > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > --
> > > 2.48.1
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> linux-phy mailing list
> linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
> https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists