[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250505223922.2682012-43-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 18:31:59 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
bigeasy@...utronix.de,
clrkwllms@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org,
paulmck@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de,
csander@...estorage.com,
kprateek.nayak@....com,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 043/486] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
From: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 61c39d8c83e2077f33e0a2c8980a76a7f323f0ce ]
Since:
0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on PREEMPT_RT.")
the wait context test for mutex usage within "in softirq context" fails
as it references @softirq_context:
| wait context tests |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.
[ boqun: Move the lockdep annotations into __local_bh_*() to avoid false
positives because of unpaired local_bh_disable() reported by
Borislav Petkov and Peter Zijlstra, and make bh_lock_map
only exist for PREEMPT_RT. ]
[ mingo: Restored authorship and improved the bh_lock_map definition. ]
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 8c4524ce65faf..00ff176350413 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -126,6 +126,18 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_ctrl, softirq_ctrl) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(softirq_ctrl.lock),
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = {
+ .name = "local_bh",
+ .key = &bh_lock_key,
+ .wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
+ .wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
+ .lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map);
+#endif
+
/**
* local_bh_blocked() - Check for idle whether BH processing is blocked
*
@@ -148,6 +160,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
+ lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map);
+
/* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */
if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) {
if (preemptible()) {
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
+
local_irq_save(flags);
curcnt = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
@@ -261,6 +277,8 @@ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void)
/* Counterpart to ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
static inline void ksoftirqd_run_end(void)
{
+ /* pairs with the lock_map_acquire_read() in ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, true);
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
local_irq_enable();
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists