linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] wifi: ath11k: Fix memory reuse logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ec0bb100-4a70-4827-86b1-e4a7e8867a2d@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 18:10:48 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>, quic_bqiang@...cinc.com,
 Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>
Cc: usama.anjum@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] wifi: ath11k: Fix memory reuse logic

On 5/6/25 12:17 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> v2 feedback was not incorporated:
> For starters, can we make the subject a bit more specific, i.e.
> Fix MHI target memory reuse logic
> 
> But don't repost for this -- I'll make that change in ath/pending
I'd changed again on the request of another reviewer. Please feel free
to change as you like. I don't have any opinion on it.

> 
> However, does ath12k need the same fix?
Looking at ath12k, there is similar code structure in
ath12k_qmi_alloc_chunk(). By adding some logging, we can confirm if
ath12k requires the fix or not. As a lot of code is similar in both
drivers, ath12k may require the same fix.

I don't have access to ath12k. So I cannot test on it.

> If so, can you post a separate patch for that?
> 
> /jeff

-- 
Regards,
Usama