[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBpyEo8SHFq7SDf4@standask-GA-A55M-S2HP>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:33:22 +0200
From: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:07:04AM +0200, Artur Weber wrote:
> Add support for the BCM59054 MFD to the bcm590xx driver (mfd and
> regulator) and fix a couple of small bugs in it that also affected
> the already supported BCM59056.
>
> While we're at it - convert the devicetree bindings to YAML format
> and drop the bcm59056 DTS in favor of describing the PMU in users'
> DTS files, as is done for most other MFDs.
>
> The BCM59054 is fairly similar to the BCM59056, with the primary
> difference being the different number and layout of regulators.
> It is primarily used in devices using the BCM21664 and BCM23550
> chipsets.
>
> This patchset has been tested on a Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo
> (baffinlite rev02; DTS not in mainline yet) with a BCM59054 PMIC.
> Testing on a BCM59056 would be appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
Other than the already applied patch 3, the whole series is
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists