linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add EDAC controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ed50b1463f62a829f863b889ab818f492b73946.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 12:22:08 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To: "William A. Kennington III" <william@...nnington.com>, Avi Fishman
 <avifishman70@...il.com>, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>, Tali Perry
 <tali.perry1@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add EDAC controller

On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 16:34 -0700, William A. Kennington III wrote:
> We have the driver support but need a common node for all the 8xx
> platforms that contain this device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@...nnington.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
> index 4da62308b274..ccebcb11c05e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
> @@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ clk: rstc: reset-controller@...01000 {
>                         #clock-cells = <1>;
>                 };
>  
> +               mc: memory-controller@...24000 {
> +                       compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-memory-controller";
> +                       reg = <0x0 0xf0824000 0x0 0x2000>;
> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                       status = "disabled";
> +               };
> +

The patch fails to apply due to fuzz, do you mind rebasing it on
nuvoton/arm64/dt from [1]?

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arj/bmc.git

Possibly it's the result of applying other patches of yours as they
were sent independently. It might be best to send them as a series even
if they are conceptually independent.

Andrew