linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 8/8] mfd: zl3073x: Register DPLL sub-device during init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e7122b1-b5ff-4800-8e1d-b1532a7c1ecf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 16:19:29 +0200
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
 Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
 Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 8/8] mfd: zl3073x: Register DPLL sub-device
 during init

On 07. 05. 25 3:41 odp., Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 3:45 PM Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Register DPLL sub-devices to expose the functionality provided
>> by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of
>> the available DPLL channels.
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static const struct zl3073x_pdata zl3073x_pdata[ZL3073X_MAX_CHANNELS] = {
>> +       { .channel = 0, },
>> +       { .channel = 1, },
>> +       { .channel = 2, },
>> +       { .channel = 3, },
>> +       { .channel = 4, },
>> +};
> 
>> +static const struct mfd_cell zl3073x_devs[] = {
>> +       ZL3073X_CELL("zl3073x-dpll", 0),
>> +       ZL3073X_CELL("zl3073x-dpll", 1),
>> +       ZL3073X_CELL("zl3073x-dpll", 2),
>> +       ZL3073X_CELL("zl3073x-dpll", 3),
>> +       ZL3073X_CELL("zl3073x-dpll", 4),
>> +};
> 
>> +#define ZL3073X_MAX_CHANNELS   5
> 
> Btw, wouldn't be better to keep the above lists synchronised like
> 
> 1. Make ZL3073X_CELL() to use indexed variant
> 
> [idx] = ...
> 
> 2. Define the channel numbers
> 
> and use them in both data structures.
> 
It could be possible to drop zl3073x_pdata array and modify ZL3073X_CELL
this way:

#define ZL3073X_CHANNEL(_channel)                               \
         &(const struct zl3073x_pdata) { .channel = _channel }

#define ZL3073X_CELL(_name, _channel)                           \
         MFD_CELL_BASIC(_name, NULL, ZL3073X_CHANNEL(_channel),  \
                        sizeof(struct zl3073x_pdata), 0)

WDYT?

Ivan