linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4176222a-3583-4a4b-8968-0cabeba6008f@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 17:49:16 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: babu.moger@....com, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
 Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
 fenghuay@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl

Hi Babu, Reinette,

On 02/05/2025 17:45, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 5/2/25 11:30, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 5/2/25 9:04 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>>
>>> I retested the patches on a couple of AMD systems, and everything looks good.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Babu Moger babu.moger@....com
> 
> Correction:
> 
> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>

Thanks for re-testing it!


>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>>
>>> It's very likely that these patches will be merged before my ABMC series [1].
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on v13 of the ABMC series and considering rebasing
>>> it on top of James' v9. That could potentially eliminate one review cycle
>>> during the merge process.
>>>
>>> What are your thoughts on this approach?
>>
>> Thanks for considering this. From my viewpoint this sounds like a good plan.
> 
> Welcome.
> 
>> I do not have insight into James's schedule to support this but from what I
>> can tell this work is close to being ready for inclusion.
> 
> Sure. Lets wait for James or Martin's response.

I've got a v9 to post, rebased on top of the cpumask changes. My only question is whether
to post it with the tail end of patches squashed together - to save Boris having to do it.


Thanks,

James