[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jvtYyXoj71WF=0MLHZLt=zfMo5+C1v7xJ6CuCkowxNmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 22:00:08 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] topology/sysfs, cpufreq/intel_pstate: Populate cpu_capacity
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 4:49 AM Ricardo Neri
<ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Capacity-aware scheduling is now supported on Intel hybrid processors. It
> makes sense now to populate the interface /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/
> cpu_capacity. User space entities can use this information to implement
> policy such as utilization clamps.
>
> This interface currently lives in arch_topology.c. Rather than implementing
> the interface again for x86, we can move it to a common location in
> topology.c from which other architectures can also benefit and populate
> using their own mechanisms.
>
> I tested this patchset on Intel Alder Lake and DragonBoard 845c. The
> interfaces are populated correctly.
>
> I'd appreciate any feedback!
>
> Thanks and BR,
> Ricardo
> Ricardo Neri (2):
> arch_topology: Relocate cpu_scale to topology.[h|c]
> cpufreq: intel_pstate: Populate the cpu_capacity sysfs entries
>
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 52 ----------------------------------
> drivers/base/topology.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 8 ------
> include/linux/topology.h | 9 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> --
Both patches applied as 6.16 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists