[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoCUofwE7zNf95KO75tkiVJkcJ3O4ybu07aYFo-wbV13JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 08:16:05 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: support software TX timestamp
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:57 AM Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Having a software timestamp (along with existing hardware one) is
> useful to trace how the packets flow through the stack.
> mlx5e_tx_skb_update_hwts_flags is called from tx paths
> to setup HW timestamp; extend it to add software one as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Only one nit as below.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
> index fdf9e9bb99ac..e399d7a3d6cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
> @@ -1689,6 +1689,7 @@ int mlx5e_ethtool_get_ts_info(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> return 0;
>
> info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
> + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
> SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
> index 4fd853d19e31..f6dd26ad29e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static void mlx5e_tx_skb_update_hwts_flags(struct sk_buff *skb)
nit: the function name including 'hwts' doesn't reflect the following
software behavior.
Thanks,
Jason
> {
> if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP))
> skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS;
> + skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
> }
>
> static void mlx5e_tx_check_stop(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq)
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists