[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5700be74-71e3-41bd-97e2-ac0c33b1c83c@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 07:31:15 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@...hat.com>, "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"Michal Marek" <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] x86/kconfig/64: Refresh defconfig
On Tue, May 6, 2025, at 19:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> @@ -63,9 +62,7 @@ CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=y
> # CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
> CONFIG_NET=y
> CONFIG_PACKET=y
> -CONFIG_UNIX=y
> CONFIG_XFRM_USER=y
> -CONFIG_INET=y
> CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
> CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
> CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
Any idea what happened here? I don't see anything selecting UNIX
and INET, and leaving them at the default-off state seems like a
bad idea.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists