[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBr8MgC7l4efb_kw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 08:22:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] x86/kconfig/64: Refresh defconfig
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2025, at 19:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > @@ -63,9 +62,7 @@ CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=y
> > # CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
> > CONFIG_NET=y
> > CONFIG_PACKET=y
> > -CONFIG_UNIX=y
> > CONFIG_XFRM_USER=y
> > -CONFIG_INET=y
> > CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
> > CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
> > CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
>
> Any idea what happened here? I don't see anything selecting UNIX
> and INET, and leaving them at the default-off state seems like a
> bad idea.
I think this is a side effect of having NET_9P support enabled, which
option comes with:
imply INET
imply UNIX
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists