| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <afd1f19b-61ee-489b-9a7f-8e48d4e6ccd0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 17:17:38 +0800
From: Qinxin Xia <xiaqinxin@...wei.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
CC: <yangyicong@...wei.com>, <hch@....de>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...wei.com>,
<fanghao11@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: add support for dma_map_sg
在 2025/5/7 10:39, Barry Song 写道:
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:01 PM Qinxin Xia <xiaqinxin@...wei.com> wrote:
>> Support for dma scatter-gather mapping and is intended for testing
>> mapping performance. It achieves by introducing the dma_sg_map_param
>> structure and related functions, which enable the implementation of
>> scatter-gather mapping preparation, mapping, and unmapping operations.
>> Additionally, the dma_map_benchmark_ops array is updated to include
>> operations for scatter-gather mapping. This commit aims to provide
>> a wider range of mapping performance test to cater to different scenarios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qinxin Xia <xiaqinxin@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/map_benchmark.h | 43 ++++++++++----
>> kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/map_benchmark.h b/include/linux/map_benchmark.h
>> index 5294dfd1870f..bf8c9ade43fd 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/map_benchmark.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/map_benchmark.h
>> @@ -17,22 +17,41 @@
>>
>> enum {
>> DMA_MAP_SINGLE_MODE,
>> + DMA_MAP_SG_MODE,
>> DMA_MAP_MODE_MAX
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * struct map_benchmark - Benchmarking data for DMA mapping operations.
>> + * @avg_map_100ns: Average map latency in 100ns.
>> + * @map_stddev: Standard deviation of map latency.
>> + * @avg_unmap_100ns: Average unmap latency in 100ns.
>> + * @unmap_stddev: Standard deviation of unmap latency.
>> + * @threads: Number of threads performing map/unmap operations in parallel.
>> + * @seconds: Duration of the test in seconds.
>> + * @node: NUMA node on which this benchmark will run.
>> + * @dma_bits: DMA addressing capability.
>> + * @dma_dir: DMA data direction.
>> + * @dma_trans_ns: Time for DMA transmission in ns.
>> + * @granule: Number of PAGE_SIZE units to map/unmap at once.
>> + In SG mode, this represents the number of scatterlist entries.
>> + In single mode, this represents the total size of the mapping.
>> + * @map_mode: Mode of DMA mapping.
>> + * @expansion: Reserved for future use.
>> + */
>> struct map_benchmark {
>> - __u64 avg_map_100ns; /* average map latency in 100ns */
>> - __u64 map_stddev; /* standard deviation of map latency */
>> - __u64 avg_unmap_100ns; /* as above */
>> + __u64 avg_map_100ns;
>> + __u64 map_stddev;
>> + __u64 avg_unmap_100ns;
>> __u64 unmap_stddev;
>> - __u32 threads; /* how many threads will do map/unmap in parallel */
>> - __u32 seconds; /* how long the test will last */
>> - __s32 node; /* which numa node this benchmark will run on */
>> - __u32 dma_bits; /* DMA addressing capability */
>> - __u32 dma_dir; /* DMA data direction */
>> - __u32 dma_trans_ns; /* time for DMA transmission in ns */
>> - __u32 granule; /* how many PAGE_SIZE will do map/unmap once a time */
>> - __u8 map_mode; /* the mode of dma map */
>> - __u8 expansion[75]; /* For future use */
>> + __u32 threads;
>> + __u32 seconds;
>> + __s32 node;
>> + __u32 dma_bits;
>> + __u32 dma_dir;
>> + __u32 dma_trans_ns;
>> + __u32 granule;
>> + __u8 map_mode;
>> + __u8 expansion[75];
>> };
>> #endif /* _KERNEL_DMA_BENCHMARK_H */
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c b/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
>> index f04973eba1d8..72cd2c5f839e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>>
>> @@ -110,8 +111,109 @@ static struct map_benchmark_ops dma_single_map_benchmark_ops = {
>> .do_unmap = dma_single_map_benchmark_do_unmap,
>> };
>>
>> +struct dma_sg_map_param {
>> + struct sg_table sgt;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + void **buf;
>> + u32 npages;
>> + u32 dma_dir;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void *dma_sg_map_benchmark_prepare(struct map_benchmark_data *map)
>> +{
>> + struct scatterlist *sg;
>> + int i = 0;
> I'm not sure we need `i = 0`; perhaps just `int i` would be sufficient.
You're right, 'int i' is more appropriate.
>
>> +
>> + struct dma_sg_map_param *mparam __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*mparam), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mparam)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Set the number of scatterlist entries based on the granule.
>> + * In SG mode, 'granule' represents the number of scatterlist entries.
>> + * Each scatterlist entry corresponds to a single page.
>> + */
>> + mparam->npages = map->bparam.granule;
>> + mparam->dma_dir = map->bparam.dma_dir;
>> + mparam->dev = map->dev;
>> + mparam->buf = kmalloc_array(mparam->npages, sizeof(*mparam->buf),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mparam->buf)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + if (sg_alloc_table(&mparam->sgt, mparam->npages, GFP_KERNEL))
>> + goto free_buf;
>> +
>> + for_each_sgtable_sg(&mparam->sgt, sg, i) {
>> + mparam->buf[i] = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mparam->buf[i])
>> + goto free_page;
>> +
>> + if (mparam->dma_dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
>> + memset(mparam->buf[i], 0x66, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + sg_set_buf(sg, mparam->buf[i], PAGE_SIZE);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return_ptr(mparam);
>> +
>> +free_page:
>> + while (i-- > 0)
>> + free_page((unsigned long)mparam->buf[i]);
>> +
>> + sg_free_table(&mparam->sgt);
>> +free_buf:
>> + kfree(mparam->buf);
>> +out:
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dma_sg_map_benchmark_unprepare(void *arg)
> The term "arg" is meaningless for a function argument, as it's already implied
> that it is an argument.
Okay, I'm going to modify this in the next version.
>> +{
>> + struct dma_sg_map_param *mparam = arg;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mparam->npages; i++)
>> + free_page((unsigned long)mparam->buf[i]);
>> +
>> + sg_free_table(&mparam->sgt);
>> +
>> + kfree(mparam->buf);
>> + kfree(mparam);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dma_sg_map_benchmark_do_map(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_sg_map_param *mparam = arg;
>> +
>> + int sg_mapped = dma_map_sg(mparam->dev, mparam->sgt.sgl,
>> + mparam->npages, mparam->dma_dir);
> int ret.
Okay, I'm going to modify this in the next version.
Thanks!
>> + if (!sg_mapped) {
>> + pr_err("dma_map_sg failed on %s\n", dev_name(mparam->dev));
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dma_sg_map_benchmark_do_unmap(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_sg_map_param *mparam = arg;
>> +
>> + dma_unmap_sg(mparam->dev, mparam->sgt.sgl, mparam->npages,
>> + mparam->dma_dir);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct map_benchmark_ops dma_sg_map_benchmark_ops = {
>> + .prepare = dma_sg_map_benchmark_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = dma_sg_map_benchmark_unprepare,
>> + .do_map = dma_sg_map_benchmark_do_map,
>> + .do_unmap = dma_sg_map_benchmark_do_unmap,
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct map_benchmark_ops *dma_map_benchmark_ops[DMA_MAP_MODE_MAX] = {
>> [DMA_MAP_SINGLE_MODE] = &dma_single_map_benchmark_ops,
>> + [DMA_MAP_SG_MODE] = &dma_sg_map_benchmark_ops,
>> };
>>
>> static int map_benchmark_thread(void *data)
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
> Thanks
> barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists