[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331aa82-fee9-4788-abd9-ef741d00909e@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 13:27:55 +0300
From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, john.ogness@...utronix.de, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
pmladek@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org, mojha@....qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 09/14] genirq: add irq_kmemdump_register
On 5/7/25 13:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> $Subject: ... See
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#patch-submission-notes
>
> On Tue, Apr 22 2025 at 14:31, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>> Add function to register irq info into kmemdump.
>
> What is irq info? Please explain explicitly which information is exposed
> and why.
>
>>
>> +void irq_kmemdump_register(void)
>> +{
>> + kmemdump_register("irq", (void *)&nr_irqs, sizeof(nr_irqs));
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_kmemdump_register);
>
> Are you going to slap a gazillion of those register a single variable
> functions all over the place?
>
> That's a really horrible idea.
>
> The obvious way to deal with that is to annotate the variable:
>
> static unsigned int nr_irqs = NR_IRQS;
> KMEMDUMP_VAR(nr_irqs);
>
> Let KMEMDUMP_VAR() store the size and the address of 'nr_irqs' in a
> kmemdump specific section and then kmemdump can just walk that section
> and dump stuff. No magic register functions and no extra storage
> management for static/global variables.
>
> No?
Thank you very much for your review ! I will try it out.
Eugen
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists