linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64/kernel: support store-only mte tag check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aBs6R0Wq0nTYsJAc@e129823.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 11:47:35 +0100
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
	joey.gouly@....com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
	frederic@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
	hardevsinh.palaniya@...iconsignals.io,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, huangxiaojia2@...wei.com,
	mark.rutland@....com, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
	palmer@...osinc.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
	thiago.bauermann@...aro.org, bgray@...ux.ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, puranjay@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
	yang@...amperecomputing.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
	joel.granados@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nd@....com,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64/kernel: support store-only mte tag check

Hi Catalin,

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:07:22AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > Introduce new flag -- MTE_CTRL_STORE_ONLY used to set store-only tag check.
> > This flag isn't overrided by prefered tcf flag setting but set together
>
> Nit: s/overrided/overridden/

Thanks!

>
> > with prefered setting of way to report tag check fault.
>
> The preferred mode set via sysfs is about whether we want synchronous or
> asynchronous tag check faults for reads/writes (or asymmetric). The
> store-only checking can be combined with sync/async, so they are
> slightly complementary. The question is whether one wants some global
> knob to turn on store-only in combination with sync/async. We could add
> more strings for sysfs like "(a)sync+storeonly"
>
> It would be good to hear Peter's opinion from an Android perspective.

Thanks to add, I'll wait for his comment for this :)

> --
> Catalin

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun