[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e068311-9223-4c1b-9091-15eb2d867ede@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 09:53:22 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <xiang@...nel.org>,
<chao@...nel.org>, <zbestahu@...il.com>, <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: <dhavale@...gle.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] erofs: fix file handle encoding for 64-bit NIDs
On 2025/5/6 23:10, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Hongbo,
>
> On 2025/4/29 21:42, Hongbo Li wrote:
>> In erofs, the inode number has the location information of
>> files. The default encode_fh uses the ino32, this will lack
>> of some information when the file is too big. So we need
>> the internal helpers to encode filehandle.
>
> EROFS uses NID to indicate the on-disk inode offset, which can
> exceed 32 bits. However, the default encode_fh uses the ino32,
> thus it doesn't work if the image is large than 128GiB.
>
Thanks for helping me correct my description.
Here, an image larger than 128GiB won't trigger NID reversal. It
requires a 128GiB file inside, and the NID of the second file may exceed
U32 during formatting. So here can we change it to "However, the default
encode_fh uses the ino32, thus it may not work if there exist a file
which is large than 128GiB." ?
Thanks,
Hongbo
> Let's introduce our own helpers to encode file handles.
>
>>
>> It is easy to reproduce test:
>
> It's easy to reproduce:
>
>> 1. prepare an erofs image with nid bigger than UINT_MAX
>
> 1. Prepare an EROFS image with NIDs larger than U32_MAX
>
>> 2. mount -t erofs foo.img /mnt/erofs
>> 3. set exportfs with configuration: /mnt/erofs *(rw,sync,
>> no_root_squash)
>> 4. mount -t nfs $IP:/mnt/erofs /mnt/nfs
>> 5. md5sum /mnt/nfs/foo # foo is the file which nid bigger
>> than UINT_MAX.
>> For overlayfs case, the under filesystem's file handle is
>> encoded in ovl_fb.fid, it is same as NFS's case.
>>
>> Fixes: 3e917cc305c6 ("erofs: make filesystem exportable")
>> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250429074109.689075-1-lihongbo22@huawei.com/
>> - Assign parent nid with correct value.
>>
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250429011139.686847-1-lihongbo22@huawei.com/
>> - Encode generation into file handle and minor clean code.
>> - Update the commiti's title.
>> ---
>> fs/erofs/super.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> index cadec6b1b554..28b3701165cc 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> @@ -511,24 +511,62 @@ static int erofs_fc_parse_param(struct
>> fs_context *fc,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -static struct inode *erofs_nfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
>> - u64 ino, u32 generation)
>> +static int erofs_encode_fh(struct inode *inode, u32 *fh, int *max_len,
>> + struct inode *parent)
>> {
>> - return erofs_iget(sb, ino);
>> + int len = parent ? 6 : 3;
>> + erofs_nid_t nid;
>
> Just `erofs_nid_t nid = EROFS_I(inode)->nid;`?
>
> I think the compiler will optimize out `if (*max_len < len)`.
>
>> + u32 generation;
>
> It seems it's unnecessary to introduce `generation` variable here?
>
>> +
>> + if (*max_len < len) {
>> + *max_len = len;
>> + return FILEID_INVALID;
>> + }
>> +
>> + nid = EROFS_I(inode)->nid;
>> + generation = inode->i_generation;
>
> So drop these two lines.
>
>> + fh[0] = (u32)(nid >> 32);
>> + fh[1] = (u32)(nid & 0xffffffff);
>> + fh[2] = generation;
>> +
>> + if (parent) {
>> + nid = EROFS_I(parent)->nid;
>> + generation = parent->i_generation;
>> +
>> + fh[3] = (u32)(nid >> 32);
>> + fh[4] = (u32)(nid & 0xffffffff);
>> + fh[5] = generation;
>
> fh[5] = parent->i_generation;
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + *max_len = len;
>> + return parent ? FILEID_INO64_GEN_PARENT : FILEID_INO64_GEN;
>> }
>> static struct dentry *erofs_fh_to_dentry(struct super_block *sb,
>> struct fid *fid, int fh_len, int fh_type)
>> {
>> - return generic_fh_to_dentry(sb, fid, fh_len, fh_type,
>> - erofs_nfs_get_inode);
>> + erofs_nid_t nid;
>> +
>> + if ((fh_type != FILEID_INO64_GEN &&
>> + fh_type != FILEID_INO64_GEN_PARENT) || fh_len < 3)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + nid = (u64) fid->raw[0] << 32;
>> + nid |= (u64) fid->raw[1];
>
> Unnecessary nid variable.
>
>> + return d_obtain_alias(erofs_iget(sb, nid));
>
> return d_obtain_alias(erofs_iget(sb,
> ((u64)fid->raw[0] << 32) | fid->raw[1]));
>
>> }
>> static struct dentry *erofs_fh_to_parent(struct super_block *sb,
>> struct fid *fid, int fh_len, int fh_type)
>> {
>> - return generic_fh_to_parent(sb, fid, fh_len, fh_type,
>> - erofs_nfs_get_inode);
>> + erofs_nid_t nid;
>> +
>> + if (fh_type != FILEID_INO64_GEN_PARENT || fh_len < 6)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + nid = (u64) fid->raw[3] << 32;
>> + nid |= (u64) fid->raw[4];
>
> Same here.
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists