lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b825ab7e-dbf6-4dcc-a35b-3fef0f0c4969@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 14:38:36 +0300
From: Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>
To: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
 Jakub Kostiw <jakub.kostiw@...etronic.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
 Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@...log.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Niklas Söderlund
 <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>, Julien Massot
 <julien.massot@...labora.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
 <brgl@...ev.pl>, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann
 <arnd@...db.de>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
 Nícolas F . R . A . Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>,
 Ross Burton <ross.burton@....com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@...iatek.com>,
 Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
 Dongcheng Yan <dongcheng.yan@...el.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>,
 Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 Ihor Matushchak <ihor.matushchak@...box.net>,
 Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....nxp.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/16] media: i2c: add Maxim GMSL2/3 serializer and
 deserializer drivers



On 5/7/25 2:22 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> Hi Jakub and Cosmin
> 
> On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 19:34, Jakub Kostiw <jakub.kostiw@...etronic.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Cosmin
>>
>> Awesome work. The initiative to establish a common framework for GMSL
>> devices is a great idea.
>>
>> I believe that we have found few bugs:
>>
>>> +#define MAX9296A_BACKTOP22(x)                        (0x31d * (x) * 0x3)
>>
>> The first multiplication is wrong and should be replaced with addition:
>>
>> +#define MAX9296A_BACKTOP22(x)                  (0x31d + (x) * 0x3)
>>
>> The same goes for MAX96724 equivalent macro:
>>
>>> +#define MAX96724_BACKTOP22(x)                        (0x415 * (x) * 0x3)
>>
>> In MAX96714 driver there is an issue with setting up lane-polarities.
>>
>>> +static const struct max9296a_chip_info max96714_info = {
>>> +     .max_register = 0x5011,
>>> +     .set_pipe_stream_id = max96714_set_pipe_stream_id,
>>> +     .set_pipe_enable = max96714_set_pipe_enable,
>>> +     .set_pipe_tunnel_enable = max96714_set_pipe_tunnel_enable,
>>> +     .phys_configs = {
>>> +             .num_configs = ARRAY_SIZE(max96714_phys_configs),
>>> +             .configs = max96714_phys_configs,
>>> +     },
>>> +     .polarity_on_physical_lanes = true,
>>> +     .supports_phy_log = true,
>>> +     .adjust_rlms = true,
>>> +     .num_pipes = 1,
>>> +     .pipe_hw_ids = { 1 },
>>> +     .num_phys = 1,
>>> +     .phy_hw_ids = { 1 },
>>> +     .num_links = 1,
>>> +};
>>
>> In order to make thing work we had to set
>>
>>> +     .polarity_on_physical_lanes = true,
>>
>> To false. So this field is either improperly set for MAX96714, or handling of this case is wrong:
>>
>>> +             if (priv->info->polarity_on_physical_lanes)
>>> +                     map = phy->mipi.data_lanes[i];
>>> +             else
>>> +                     map = i;
>>
>> Upon mentioned changes we have successfully tested two GMSL2
>> combinations on Raspberry 5 platform:
>>
>> 1. MAX96724 + MAX96717 (only 2 MIPI-CSI2 lanes with single camera due to
>> hardware limitations)
>>
>> 2. MAX96714 + MAX96717
> 
> Feel free to shout if you want help on the Pi side.
> 
> Pi5 should be able to extract multiple virtual channels to support
> several sensors simultaneously (up to 4 VC/DT combinations). It does
> need a rework so the CFE runs from memory rather than being fed data
> directly from the CSI-2 receiver, but I believe that is pencilled in
> as future work with libcamera already.
> 

Hi Dave, thanks for your input! I'm glad this is getting some traction.

I'm currently testing using Tomi's pyv4l2 tool, which already contains
RPi5 GMSL configs.

I've tested the multi-camera simultaneously streaming usecase already,
all is working well, and I was able to get 4 separate camera image
streams (or 2 image and 2 meta), streaming to the RPi5, and then to
a remote host (where debayer is feasible to do without the help of an
ISP).

Last time I tried libcamera it was not able to properly configure all
entities, so testing with just the mainline CFE using pyv4l2 makes it
much simpler, since we're only interested in getting our hardware
supported.

> Unless things have regressed, libcamera should report all connected
> sensors to SerDes setups, and set up Media Controller appropriately to
> use them one at a time. I know I've had that working with simple CSI-2
> multiplexers and thought I'd had it working with TI FPD-Link III
> SerDes (Arducam's IMX219 V3Link kit, modded to remove their MCU). I
> don't have any GMSL hardware to test with.
> 
> We're also fairly open to merging drivers and overlays for 3rd party
> hardware into the downstream Pi kernel. If they've been reviewed and
> merged upstream then that is the ideal, but if you're prepared to
> support them, then it saves the user the headache of having to build
> out-of-tree modules.
> 
> Cheers
>    Dave


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ