[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aeab63d4-9740-4213-86c3-ca975762046e@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 18:00:15 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: airoha: Use dev_err_probe()
Le 08/05/2025 à 17:43, Lorenzo Bianconi a écrit :
> On May 08, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Use dev_err_probe() to slightly simplify the code.
>> It is less verbose, more informational and makes error logging more
>> consistent in the probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - New patch
>>
>> Compile tested only.
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> index 2335aa59b06f..7404ee894467 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> @@ -2896,10 +2896,9 @@ static int airoha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> eth->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>
>> err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(eth->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(eth->dev, "failed configuring DMA mask\n");
>> - return err;
>> - }
>> + if (err)
>> + return dev_err_probe(eth->dev, err,
>> + "failed configuring DMA mask\n");
>
> Can dma_set_mask_and_coherent() return -EPROBE_DEFER? The other parts are fine.
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
No, it can't, but using dev_err_probe() does not hurt.
Using dev_err_probe():
- saves 1 LoC
- is consistent in the function
- log the error code in a human readable format
- generate smaller binaries (can easily be checked with size)
So, even if "unneeded", I think it is still a improvement.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists