[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25c89e3c-9625-49ac-b816-945ab9145f87@163.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 00:12:24 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, heiko@...ech.de,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, yue.wang@...ogic.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: aardvark: Remove redundant MPS configuration
On 2025/5/8 19:53, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:47:12AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> On 2025/5/8 00:36, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, but I stopped doing any testing of the aardvark driver with the
>>> mainline kernel after PCI maintainers stopped taking fixes for the
>>> driver and stopped responding.
>>>
>>> I'm not going to debug same issues again, which I have analyzed,
>>> prepared fixes, sent patches and see no progress there.
>>>
>>> Seems that there is a status quo, and I'm not going to change it.
>>
>> Dear Niklas,
>>
>> Do you have any opinion on Pali's reply? Should patch 3/3 be discarded?
>
> While I do have an opinion, I'm not going to share it on a public mailing
> list :)
>
> With regards to your patch 3/3, I think that your patch looks fine, but if
> the driver maintainer does not want the cleanup for >reasons*, that is totally
> fine with me. However, I'm not a PCI maintainer, so my opinion does not really
> matter. It's the PCI maintainers that decide.
>
Dear Niklas,
Thank you very much for your reply. Let's wait for the decision of the
PCI maintainer on this series of patches.
Best regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists