lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhnz33dwwd3npj2re7dn7invntzk6dk7u75ue2pzg35vdappjd@tgqlccmoydar>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 11:30:29 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, 
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm reclaim section

On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> In furtherance of ongoing efforts to ensure people are aware of who
> de-facto maintains/has an interest in specific parts of mm, as well trying
> to avoid get_maintainers.pl listing only Andrew and the mailing list for mm
> files - establish a reclaim memory management section and add relevant
> maintainers/reviewers.
> 
> This is a key part of memory management so sensibly deserves its own
> section.
> 
> This encompasses both 'classical' reclaim and MGLRU and thus reflects this
> in the reviewers from both, as well as those who have contributed
> specifically on the memcg side of things.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>

Seems fine to me, though I would put Johannes as M (if he is fine with
it).

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ