[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aB0MW6kQJHYW9LWi@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 22:56:11 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.cn>, lee@...nel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, peterhuewe@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de,
Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] tpm: Add a driver for Loongson TPM device
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:13:04PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > +static int tpm_loongson_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct loongson_se_engine *tpm_engine = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > + struct tpm_loongson_cmd *cmd_ret = tpm_engine->command_ret;
> > +
> > + memcpy(buf, tpm_engine->data_buffer, cmd_ret->data_len);
>
> Should we limit the memcpy to `count`?
>
> I mean, can happen that `count` is less than `cmd_ret->data_len`?
It should check-and-fail:
if (cmd_ret->data_len > count)
return -EIO;
Thanks, this was a good catch.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists