linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] nf_conntrack: sysctl: expose gc worker scan interval via sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALkUMdTPQcWsgM-x-J=T6DPcbM18qiLyZ1VdNfAxhcB_n9gWPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 11:24:51 +0530
From: Vimal Agrawal <avimalin@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: vimal.agrawal@...hos.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
	anirudh.gupta@...hos.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nf_conntrack: sysctl: expose gc worker scan interval
 via sysctl

Hi all,

Let me know if you have any comment/s on the patch.

Thanks,
Vimal

On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:57 AM Vimal Agrawal <avimalin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Florian for the suggestions and comments.
>
> Hi Pablo, netfilter-devel,
> Could you also please review the patch and let me know if you have any comment/s
>
> Thanks,
> Vimal
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 1:27 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> >
> > avimalin@...il.com <avimalin@...il.com> wrote:
> > > From: Vimal Agrawal <vimal.agrawal@...hos.com>
> > >
> > > Default initial gc scan interval of 60 secs is too long for system
> > > with low number of conntracks causing delay in conntrack deletion.
> > > It is affecting userspace which are replying on timely arrival of
> > > conntrack destroy event. So it is better that this is controlled
> > > through sysctl
> >
> > Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> >