[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBxIlUYEPojTopek@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 23:00:53 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.se>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Igor Belousov <igor.b@...dev.am>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zblock: use vmalloc for page allocations
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 02:58:14PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Oh, I didn't realize that zram was the only swap_slot_free_notify
> user. zram already handles REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES so
> I guess only swap-cluster needs some work. Are there any
> blockers/complications on the swap-cluster side?
I think the reason it was added it was so that the discard can be
done non-blocking with a spinlock held. Which seems a bit sketch
when calling into a driver anyway..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists