linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/zblock: use vmalloc for page allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fbftgni67wha2c6zdx3w5ccsxwlrr5yog6ifipkr4ft7h3hezo@kwb66muoctdj>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 15:33:17 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.se>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, 
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, 
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Igor Belousov <igor.b@...dev.am>, 
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zblock: use vmalloc for page allocations

On (25/05/08 15:17), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (25/05/07 23:00), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 02:58:14PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Oh, I didn't realize that zram was the only swap_slot_free_notify
> > > user.  zram already handles REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES so
> > > I guess only swap-cluster needs some work.  Are there any
> > > blockers/complications on the swap-cluster side?
> > 
> > I think the reason it was added it was so that the discard can be
> > done non-blocking with a spinlock held.  Which seems a bit sketch
> > when calling into a driver anyway..
> 
> swap_slot_free_notify is not guaranteed to free anything on the zram/zsmalloc
> side. zram attempts to trylock entry

.. I keep forgetting that slot-free can be called from an IRQ.  That's
some complication.