linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/55] 5.15.182-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <843c2ffe-6653-4975-a818-03d4bb9e5be6@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 10:44:45 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/55] 5.15.182-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 07/05/2025 19:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.182 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 09 May 2025 18:37:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.182-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

...
  
> Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
>      serial: msm: Configure correct working mode before starting earlycon

The above commit is breaking the build for ARM64 and I am seeing
the following build error ...

drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c: In function ‘msm_serial_early_console_setup_dm’:
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX’?
  1737 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX, MSM_UART_CR);
       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                  UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:60: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR’?
  1737 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX, MSM_UART_CR);
       |                                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                                            UART_CR
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1738:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX’?
  1738 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX, MSM_UART_CR);
       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                  UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX
   CC      drivers/ata/libata-transport.o
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1739:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_TX_ENABLE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_TX_ENABLE’?
  1739 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_TX_ENABLE, MSM_UART_CR);
       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                  UART_CR_TX_ENABLE


After reverting this, the build is passing again.

Thanks!
Jon

-- 
nvpublic