[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aByhln4CpobzSz3s@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 14:20:38 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, quic_rgottimu@...cinc.com,
quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
quic_nkela@...cinc.com, quic_psodagud@...cinc.com,
abel.vesa@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/2] qcom: x1e80100: Enable CPUFreq
Hi Sibi and Bjorn,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 06:38:38PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> This series enables CPUFreq support on the X1E SoC using the SCMI perf
> protocol. This was originally part of the RFC: firmware: arm_scmi:
> Qualcomm Vendor Protocol [1]. I've split it up so that this part can
> land earlier. Warnings Introduced by the series are fixed by [2]
With the SCMI perf quirk for the Qualcomm firmware merged for 6.16, we
can now finally get this one merged.
There appears to be a trivial conflict due to a context change (the new
watchdog node) however.
Can you fix that up when applying, Bjorn, or do you want Sibi to send a
v8?
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists