lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2640c7dc-5870-f57d-e1cd-535f5c48d950@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 17:27:37 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, ikepanhc@...il.com, 
    Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, 
    Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
    "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, 
    ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Move Lenovo files into lenovo subdir

On Thu, 8 May 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2025, at 10:01 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 May 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >
> >> Move all Lenovo specific files into their own sub-directory as part
> >> of clean-up exercise.
> >> Longer term goal is to break-up thinkpad_acpi to improve maintainability
> >> and perhaps share more functionality with other non thinkpad Lenovo
> >> platforms.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
> >> ---
> >> Some questions that I didn't want to put in the commit comment:
> >> 
> >>  - I didn't know if now was a good time to propose this change. I
> >>    realise it could cause headaches for anybody with patches being
> >>    worked on.
> >
> > Don't worry too much about other changes, if you don't recall anything 
> > immediately, there likely isn't anything that significant. If we always
> > postpone useful reorganizations in fear that some hypothetical work would 
> > have to rebase, it never gets done :-).
> >
> >>    Please let me know what makes it easiest for maintainers
> >>    and other developers. If there is a particular branch that would be
> >>    better to do this against also let me know.
> >
> > Once I've merged fixes branch into for-next (I should do that at latest 
> > early next week if not already this week), it should be pretty 
> > straightforward to handle such move without conflicts.
> >
> 
> OK - thanks. If there's anything I can do to help let me know.
> 
> 
> >>  - Should I be updating the MAINTAINERS file? I'm still not sure what
> >>    the protocol there is. I'm very happy to help review anything in the
> >>    lenovo directory, but I didn't want to make assumptions.
> >
> > You should certainly update MAINTAINERS in the same patch to the new 
> > paths. If you want to make other changes, put them such as add your name 
> > into some entry or create a generic LENOVO entry, put those into own 
> > patch after the move please.
> >
> 
> OK - I'll submit a v2 with that change. Thanks for the guidance

Yes but please wait until I've done the merge so you can base v2 on top of 
it. Thanks.

> >>  - I have tested on multiple platforms but I don't have any ideapads I
> >>    can use.
> >
> > Given it's just moves file to new place, the threat of breaking something 
> > that isn't detected by simple build test, isn't that high.
> >
> Agreed - thanks for the review.
> 
> Mark
> 

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ