[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBy_aBkC7NpicXho@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 17:27:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/26] bus: simple-pm-bus: Populate child nodes at
probe
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 09:12:47AM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> The simple-pm-bus drivers handles several simple bus. When it is used
bus --> busses ?
> with busses other than a compatible "simple-pm-bus", it don't populate
> its child devices during its probe.
>
> This confuses fw_devlink and results in wrong or missing devlinks.
>
> Once a driver is bound to a device and the probe() has been called,
> device_links_driver_bound() is called.
>
> This function performs operation based on the following assumption:
> If a child firmware node of the bound device is not added as a
> device, it will never be added.
>
> Among operations done on fw_devlinks of those "never be added" devices,
> device_links_driver_bound() changes their supplier.
>
> With devices attached to a simple-bus compatible device, this change
> leads to wrong devlinks where supplier of devices points to the device
> parent (i.e. simple-bus compatible device) instead of the device itself
> (i.e. simple-bus child).
>
> When the device attached to the simple-bus is removed, because devlinks
> are not correct, its consumers are not removed first.
>
> In order to have correct devlinks created, make the simple-pm-bus driver
> compliant with the devlink assumption and create its child devices
> during its probe.
...
> if (match && match->data) {
> if (of_property_match_string(np, "compatible", match->compatible) == 0)
Side note, there is an fwnode_is_device_compatible() API for such cases. And IIRC
there is also OF variant of it.
> - return 0;
> + goto populate;
> else
> return -ENODEV;
> }
...
> + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
Why do you need this check? AFAICS it dups the one the call has already in it.
> + of_platform_depopulate(&pdev->dev);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists