[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83401d0a-ca96-4cfd-9016-13a8604beb9c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 15:58:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Richard Hu <richard.hu@...hnexion.com>, sascha.hauer@...gutronix.de,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: imx@...ts.linux.dev, ray.chang@...hnexion.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add TechNexion EDM-G-IMX8M-PLUS
SoM on WB-EDM-G carrier board
On 09/05/2025 15:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> No, that's not a spi controller.
>
> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>
>
>> + compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv";
>
> I doubt that. Drop the node or fix the compatible.
... especially that dh2228fv does not exist. There is no such device
from ROHM. If you claim otherwise, please share this imaginary device
datasheet.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists