linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add RADXA ROCK 5T support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <116456515.nniJfEyVGO@diego>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 17:25:41 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
 "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add RADXA ROCK 5T support

Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2025, 16:17:07 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Rob Herring (Arm):
> 
> On Fri, 09 May 2025 14:31:40 +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > This is a small series, depending on Sebastian Reichel's ROCK 5B+
> > series[1], to also add support for the ROCK 5T.
> > 
> > The ROCK 5T is quite similar to the ROCK 5B+ and the ROCK 5B, so to
> > share as much DT boilerplate between them as we can, this series
> > reorganises things a bit and then adds the ROCK 5T .dts.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250508-rock5bp-for-upstream-v2-0-677033cc1ac2@kernel.org/T/ [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > Nicolas Frattaroli (3):
> >       dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add RADXA ROCK 5T
> >       arm64: dts: rockchip: reorganise common rock5* nodes
> >       arm64: dts: rockchip: add ROCK 5T device tree
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml          |    5 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile              |    1 +
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b-5bp-5t.dtsi   | 1012 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dtsi   | 1012 +-------------------
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5t.dts    |  105 ++
> >  5 files changed, 1131 insertions(+), 1004 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 19c541fe872387798a25df947f56a26212aa9a97
> > change-id: 20250509-add-rock5t-fde5927de36b
> > prerequisite-message-id: <20250508-rock5bp-for-upstream-v2-0-677033cc1ac2@...nel.org>
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 02bf159533bb53d2cb1b6c8c7caf1d3fcfbfa4ea
> > prerequisite-patch-id: fc153d1d48f19d63520086a6eaadfec2db960470
> > prerequisite-patch-id: f445b893edf31ccf3311e146a53e5d24861c2475
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 5dc410a438ad5a7aa8962e380d2733782f5d7d18
> > prerequisite-patch-id: c70ae0e30be2a3385d2f2a09f474ff2b76293843
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
> series.
> 
> Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
> are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
> maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
> unless the platform maintainer has comments.
> 
> If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
> make sure dt-schema is up to date:
> 
>   pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> 
> This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
>  Base: using specified base-commit 19c541fe872387798a25df947f56a26212aa9a97
>  Deps: looking for dependencies matching 5 patch-ids
>  Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: move rock 5b to include file
>  Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: move rock 5b to include file
>  Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 5B+
>  Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Rock 5B+
>  Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add USB-C support for ROCK 5B+
> 
> If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag
> (or use b4 which does this automatically)
> 
> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/' for 20250509-add-rock5t-v1-0-cff1de74eced@...labora.com:
> 
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b-plus.dtb: edp@...d0000 (rockchip,rk3588-edp): clock-names:2: 'grf' was expected
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/rockchip/rockchip,analogix-dp.yaml#
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5t.dtb: edp@...d0000 (rockchip,rk3588-edp): clock-names:2: 'grf' was expected
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/rockchip/rockchip,analogix-dp.yaml#

Fixed that in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250509152329.2004073-1-heiko@sntech.de/

(edp0 node was correct, edp1 node contained a clock named spdif, that
probably came from the vendor-tree)