[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jpydvwxzf72l64p5owytl7wusqhrpvfmcsqaeuhoxvymjkeue3@xb6skacvappg>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 13:24:56 -0400
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, willy@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: madvise: make MADV_NOHUGEPAGE a no-op if !THP
* Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com> [250509 01:47]:
> On 5/8/2025 9:04 PM, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > Which one should Cc stable, I don't see it on either patch?
>
> The patch in this thread is the one without CC to stable, and the one here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250507-map-map_stack-to-vm_nohugepage-only-if-thp-is-enabled-v5-1-c6c38cfefd6e@kuka.com/
>
> has CC to stable.
>
> I had submitted both patches together in a series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250506-map-map_stack-to-vm_nohugepage-only-if-thp-is-enabled-v2-0-f11f0c794872@kuka.com/
>
> but then Andrew explained that this is troublesome, that's why I then submitted them separately.
Right, okay. I felt like I was going crazy because I was sure I looked
at this before, but couldn't figure out what was going on.
Thanks,
Liam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists