[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1F6EBA7E-C859-47B3-8D8E-0788A1C9A13F@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 11:00:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] x86/kbuild: Introduce the 'x86_32' subarchitecture
On May 9, 2025 5:04:38 AM PDT, David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 7 May 2025 08:35:05 +0200
>Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>...
>> Let's just have x86_32 as the internal primary subarchitecture name,
>> with support for historic aliases like 'i386'. That it cleans up things
>> for defconfig naming is a bonus.
>
>Aren't there 3 variants?
>Although the 3rd x32? running ILP32 in 'long mode' isn't used much
>(if at all?)
>
> David
x32 is user space only.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists