linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Remove redundant calls to einj_get_available_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g9qbKWHgL5gmSQN3vAbj3DUZH0LSdxtY2O5JXscbsGFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 21:25:48 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Zaid Alali <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, lenb@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, 
	tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, robert.moore@...el.com, 
	Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, Benjamin.Cheatham@....com, 
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, Avadhut.Naik@....com, 
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, john.allen@....com, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Remove redundant calls to einj_get_available_error_type

On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:58 PM Zaid Alali <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 01:34:35PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:38 PM Zaid Alali
> > <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > A single call to einj_get_available_error_type in init function is
> > > sufficient to save the return value in a global variable to be used
> > > later in various places in the code. This commit does not introduce
> > > any functional changes, but only removing unnecessary redundant
> > > function calls.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Zaid Alali <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com>
> >
> > Does this patch depend on patches [1-3/7]?  If not, I can pick it up
> > as an optimization.
> Hi Rafael,
>
> No, this patch is does not depend on 1-3 patches. You can pick it up!

Now applied as 6.16 material, thanks!