lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37d526f0-fe95-4b56-9288-c3388e575e7d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 08:43:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm SC8180X Camera
 clock controller

On 09/05/2025 07:56, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the camera clock controller on
> Qualcomm SC8180X platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc8180x-camcc.yaml         |  67 ++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8180x-camcc.h     | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 248 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>


---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Full context and explanation:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ