linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V11 00/15] Rust abstractions for clk, cpumask, cpufreq, OPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mSDEwDQx6ePq20SRi40aCs95mwo6fShZ0WCK9rmiWVVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:43:30 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, 
	Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@...il.com>, a.hindborg@...nel.org, alex.bennee@...aro.org, 
	alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, anisse@...ier.eu, 
	benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, 
	bqe@...gle.com, dakr@...nel.org, dakr@...hat.com, 
	daniel.almeida@...labora.com, gary@...yguo.net, joakim.bech@...aro.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, linux@...musvillemoes.dk, 
	manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, nm@...com, 
	ojeda@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	tmgross@...ch.edu, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, vireshk@...nel.org, 
	yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 00/15] Rust abstractions for clk, cpumask, cpufreq, OPP

On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 4:10 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> That's strange. I have tested this earlier and made sure such issues
> weren't there. I tried "next-20250507" now for arm64 (with qemu)
> with and without CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and still don't
> see these issues.
>
> Anything apart from this ?
>
> CONFIG_RUST_KERNEL_DOCTESTS=y
>
> Sorry for the trouble, I thought this is all covered already
> (apart from x86 failure).

No worries, it happens!

I can still reproduce it on next-20250508 with defconfig RUST=y
KUNIT=y RUST_KERNEL_DOCTESTS=y and then running in QEMU with e.g.
`-machine virt -cpu cortex-a53`.

Cheers,
Miguel