[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aB1fO4AV73VXocMP@fedora>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 09:49:47 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, storagedev@...rochip.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] scsi: use block layer helpers to calculate num of
queues
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Multiqueue devices should only allocate queues for the housekeeping CPUs
> when isolcpus=managed_irq is set.
> This avoids that the isolated CPUs get disturbed with OS workload.
The above words should be removed, since that isn't what the patch is
doing.
Otherwise, looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists