[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aB3EIxfwTbpQw7Eo@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 18:00:19 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 11/19] clk: imx: add support for i.MX8MM anatop clock
driver
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:34:38AM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> From the log I see that you are testing a board with i.MX8MP, but it's
> probing the anatop for i.MX8MM.
> Is it possible that you have the CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MM option enabled?
This is an arm64 defconfig so whatever that has set, including the
above. Note that arm64 is supposed to be single kernel build for all
platforms so we shouldn't explode due to config options for other
platforms.
Current -next defconfig:
https://builds.sirena.org.uk/f48887a98b78880b7711aca311fbbbcaad6c4e3b/arm64/defconfig/config
> I have personally tested the patches on i.MX8MN and i.MX8MP
> architectures, with only
> CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MN and CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MP enabled respectively, and I
> didn't encounter any issues.
Given it's wide use for CI the defconfig really needs covering, any
random combination of options that can be set ought to work though.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists