[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a14cf38-9a7b-462b-80d1-ec5026b5a565@tuxon.dev>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 13:58:37 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, magnus.damm@...il.com,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: renesas: rzg2l-cpg: Add support for MSTOP in
clock enable/disable API
Hi, Geert,
On 07.05.2025 18:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:06, Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>
>> The RZ/{G2L, V2L, G3S} CPG versions support a feature called MSTOP. Each
>> module has one or more MSTOP bits associated with it, and these bits need
>> to be configured along with the module clocks. Setting the MSTOP bits
>> switches the module between normal and standby states.
>>
>> Previously, MSTOP support was abstracted through power domains
>> (struct generic_pm_domain::{power_on, power_off} APIs). With this
>> abstraction, the order of setting the MSTOP and CLKON bits was as follows:
>>
>> Previous Order:
>> A/ Switching to Normal State (e.g., during probe):
>> 1/ Clear module MSTOP bits
>> 2/ Set module CLKON bits
>>
>> B/ Switching to Standby State (e.g., during remove):
>> 1/ Clear CLKON bits
>> 2/ Set MSTOP bits
>>
>> However, in some cases (when the clock is disabled through devres), the
>> order may have been (due to the issue described in link section):
>>
>> 1/ Set MSTOP bits
>> 2/ Clear CLKON bits
>>
>> Recently, the hardware team has suggested that the correct order to set
>> the MSTOP and CLKON bits is:
>>
>> Updated Order:
>> A/ Switching to Normal State (e.g., during probe):
>> 1/ Set CLKON bits
>> 2/ Clear MSTOP bits
>
> What is the recommended order in case multiple clocks map to
> the same module? Clear the MSTOP bit(s) after enabling the first clock,
> or clear the MSTOP bit(s) after enabling all clocks?
I can't find anything about this in the HW manual.
> I believe the code implements the former?
The proposed implementation clears the MSTOP after enabling the first clock
taking into account that there might be cases where 2 clocks sharing the
same MSTOP may not be both enabled for a particular functionality.
Thank you for your review,
Claudiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists