[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7695636a-e6c8-476d-ba8e-51185a7ae2cb@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 14:06:16 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
bvanassche@....org, andersson@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org
Cc: quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 01/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API
call
On 5/3/25 6:24 PM, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Introduce a new phy calibrate API call in the UFS Qualcomm driver to
> separate phy calibration from phy power-on. This change is a precursor
> to the next patchset in this series, which requires these two operations
> to be distinct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
> ---
I would imagine this would all go through a single tree - be it phy or
ufs, up to the maintainers - unless you want to merge it right now,
Bart/Martin?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists