linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] TEE updates for 6.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a877f411-f6df-45dd-9cf2-351d785db4c2@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 11:10:10 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: "Jens Wiklander" <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>, arm <arm@...nel.org>,
 soc@...nel.org, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] TEE updates for 6.16

On Fri, May 9, 2025, at 23:22, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:14 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> The second patch looks like it should be a bugfix for 6.15 instead,
>> any reason to have it only in 6.16?
>
> FWIW, it's more of a cleanup than a real bugfix; there is an unsigned
> integer wraparound, but if that occurs, we're guaranteed to hit a
> memory allocation bailout pretty much immediately afterwards. So I
> think putting it in 6.16 is reasonable.

Ok, I see. Merged now.

     Arnd