linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add bindings for mpq8785 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa4c2229-e6a6-4a62-b4e3-911c935327ca@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 22:23:59 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@...il.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Noah Wang <noahwang.wang@...look.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
 Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
 Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Grant Peltier
 <grantpeltier93@...il.com>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@...o.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Charles Hsu <ythsu0511@...il.com>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add bindings for mpq8785
 driver

On 11/05/2025 05:55, Pawel Dembicki wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for Monolithic Power Systems MPQ8785, MPM82504
> and MPM3695 PMBus-compliant voltage regulators.
> 
> These bindings also documents the optional
> "mps,vout-fb-divider-ratio-permille" property.
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Full context and explanation:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof