lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCEc5tYPivxvRVDK@makrotopia.org>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 22:55:50 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, linux@...web.de,
	olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
	angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, arinc.unal@...nc9.com,
	Landen.Chao@...iatek.com, dqfext@...il.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
	lorenzo@...nel.org, nbd@....name, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 09/14] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7988: add switch
 node

On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 11:25:27PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > i will move that into the board dtsi file in v2 because "normal" bpi-r4 and 2g5 variant are same here.
> 
> Maybe you just need to expand the commit message? What does this .dtsi
> actually represent? The SoC, or what is common across a number of
> boards?

mt7988a.dtsi represents the SoC, and thus there shouldn't be any
labels assigned to the DSA ports.

In case of the BananaPi R4 there are two different boards, one with 2x
SFP+ and one with 1x SFP+ + 1x 2500Base-T (with PoE-in), hence there is
a dtsi files for all the parts shared among the two boards. I suppose
Frank meant to move the labels to that board dtsi file, and that's
correct imho as the labels of the 1G switch ports are the same on BPi-R4
and BPi-R4-PoE.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ