[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250512145517.6e0666e3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 14:55:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@....com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
between commit:
608a76b65288 ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add support for the "Requested CPU Min frequency" BIOS option")
from the pm tree and commit:
d7484babd2c4 ("x86/msr: Rename 'rdmsrl_on_cpu()' to 'rdmsrq_on_cpu()'")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (the former removed a line updated by the latter) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists